<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>blog.codesector.com - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-e0ce5b97" type="application/json"/><link>http://codesector.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://codesector.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 09:19:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: TeraCopy 2.3 beta</title><link>http://blog.codesector.com/2012/01/30/teracopy-2-3-beta/#comment-530240256</link><description>&lt;p&gt;单字节文件夹复制会产生BUG 比如 c:/c/**.** 复制到 N:/ explorer.exe 会崩溃&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mexifan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 09:19:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TeraCopy 2.3 beta</title><link>http://blog.codesector.com/2012/01/30/teracopy-2-3-beta/#comment-529632414</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there a way to disable the Fat32 check, and copy anyway?   I have an apple time capsule NAS that reports itself as a fat32 drive to windows clients, but is in fact, a modern file system that can handle arbitrarily large files.  Right now, I am unable to copy files larger than 4Gb to it due to this check, where the windows explorer can do it fine.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bret</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 17:13:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SpeedView 2.9</title><link>http://blog.codesector.com/2012/02/08/speedview-2-9/#comment-529556574</link><description>&lt;p&gt;radiotrib, I'll look into it as soon as I'm done working on a new version. Thanks for bringing this to our attention.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;David John Hill, please let me know what device are you running the app on.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Fishfulthinkin, I believe I've answered you through our support system.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Tim Brotzge, we haven't touched the part that searches for sats for a very long time now, and there's not much to break in the first place as all it does is listen to what the GPS receiver in your device reports, so... the problem probably lies somewhere else on your side.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:38:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SpeedView 2.9</title><link>http://blog.codesector.com/2012/02/08/speedview-2-9/#comment-491197182</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cannot work out how to change from miles to kilometres &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David John Hill</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 23:46:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SpeedView 2.9</title><link>http://blog.codesector.com/2012/02/08/speedview-2-9/#comment-486738355</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting problem with my new HTC One-X. The readings seem to be resolved so quickly that the speed gets the jitters. I'm sitting typing this and my speed is varying between 0 and 8 kph whilst my heading shifts through the compass at random. It would seem that the program is not compensating for the extreme speed of the new breed of phone, and is not averaging the speed over a sufficiently long period so it fails to smooth out the normal GPS jitters.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One for the next upgrade perhaps ???&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">radiotrib</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 03:02:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TeraCopy 2.3 beta</title><link>http://blog.codesector.com/2012/01/30/teracopy-2-3-beta/#comment-470207477</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, did you know about customer care? I want to be a new customer, but with no answer and bug fixing.... :( &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter S</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:09:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TeraCopy 2.3 beta</title><link>http://blog.codesector.com/2012/01/30/teracopy-2-3-beta/#comment-468551100</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Important, TeraCopy must check the destination copy for exists, before beginnging verify. Because, i coulde delete the file on destination drive.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter S</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 17:05:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TeraCopy 2.3 beta</title><link>http://blog.codesector.com/2012/01/30/teracopy-2-3-beta/#comment-468300177</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Please fix the Verify options on not copied files.&lt;br&gt;Examples. I've copied lot of files from ntfs to fat32 external hd.&lt;br&gt;Files over 4 GB was not copied, correct. But after the copy session&lt;br&gt;I clicked verfiy and these options checked all not copied files also,&lt;br&gt;instead skipped those files. It costs lot of time and as surprise,&lt;br&gt;TeraCopy give an error, because it could not find the destionation&lt;br&gt;file. Logically, grrr. Please fix it soon, and I'm your customer. I Promise.&lt;br&gt;TeraCopy need lot of time to skip locked files. Please fix this also.&lt;br&gt;Thank you very much :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter S</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 07:55:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TeraCopy 2.3 beta</title><link>http://blog.codesector.com/2012/01/30/teracopy-2-3-beta/#comment-465055656</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Also Avast and Comodo antivirus detect it as a malware.&lt;br&gt;I wonder why! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Suhhag</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 08:58:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TeraCopy 2.3 beta</title><link>http://blog.codesector.com/2012/01/30/teracopy-2-3-beta/#comment-464180789</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My freeware copy of Teracopy 2.3 is no longer moving files.  Its border is now red and abruptly ends  the process before files are moved.  What can I do to correct this error?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest W</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:28:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TeraCopy 2.3 beta</title><link>http://blog.codesector.com/2012/01/30/teracopy-2-3-beta/#comment-463682276</link><description>&lt;p&gt;With this version when copying large files the system crashes. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:03:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TeraCopy 2.3 beta</title><link>http://blog.codesector.com/2012/01/30/teracopy-2-3-beta/#comment-457657534</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Do you have TeraCopy set to always run as administrator?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dr Bits</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 04:11:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TeraCopy 2.3 beta</title><link>http://blog.codesector.com/2012/01/30/teracopy-2-3-beta/#comment-455015361</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The first guy that posted expressed his wish for empty folders to be automatically deleted. PLEASE do not integrate this without an option. I want my empty folders to be copied.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">IneedHelp</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 20:00:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TeraCopy 2.3 beta</title><link>http://blog.codesector.com/2012/01/30/teracopy-2-3-beta/#comment-451570935</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been using this for over two years now with no problems at all, in XP and 7 Ultimate. And yes with Avira too. I love it to bits and it's one of the first things I install in a fresh Windows.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The "unnecessary verification of skipped files" ... can't speak for anyone else of course, but I've actually found that quite useful a couple of times. Can we have it back please? At least as an option.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sicknero</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:43:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TeraCopy 2.3 beta</title><link>http://blog.codesector.com/2012/01/30/teracopy-2-3-beta/#comment-450205172</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When will you fix the problem of TeraCopy not keeping the Security ACLs of a moved file? Whenever I move a file, I need to-readd the permissions for "Everyone" to the files. Win 7 x64.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">None</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:45:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TeraCopy 2.3 beta</title><link>http://blog.codesector.com/2012/01/30/teracopy-2-3-beta/#comment-448058469</link><description>&lt;p&gt;am reporting for lack of support. when they don't like your comments, they delete them&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">disgusted</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 13:42:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TeraCopy 2.3 beta</title><link>http://blog.codesector.com/2012/01/30/teracopy-2-3-beta/#comment-446911025</link><description>&lt;p&gt; If I set the ini-file to say ForceSameDriveMode=1 then the copy completes without problem (tested both on this 2.3 beta as well as 2.2 Beta 3).     &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Randy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:25:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SpeedView 2.9</title><link>http://blog.codesector.com/2012/02/08/speedview-2-9/#comment-445469229</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was having trouble finding "settings" on my free version so I paid $2.99 for Pro but still dont have settings to change units, do the trip travel, do the 1/4mi time etc...Where did all that go??? There is NO settings function in this app anymore...Im using an HTC EVO View 4G tab with Gingerbread....thanks! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fishfulthinkin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:00:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SpeedView 2.9</title><link>http://blog.codesector.com/2012/02/08/speedview-2-9/#comment-445383858</link><description>&lt;p&gt;After upgrade now it cannot find sat. Keeps jumping from 1-7 and back to 0. Using DROID x. Going to uninstall and try again. B4 I delete 4 good.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim Brotzge</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 22:06:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TeraCopy 2.3 beta</title><link>http://blog.codesector.com/2012/01/30/teracopy-2-3-beta/#comment-444860446</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You should be able to set a throttling threshold during the copy (like ultracopier) to prevent saturating WAN links. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:13:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TeraCopy 2.3 beta</title><link>http://blog.codesector.com/2012/01/30/teracopy-2-3-beta/#comment-444176737</link><description>&lt;p&gt; An update -- it turns out that 2.2 Beta 3 fails the same way, as does 2.12.  Windows explorer and XXCOPY both copy the partition without problems, and the files for which TeraCopy reports read errors are in fact readable.    &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Randy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:25:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TeraCopy 2.3 beta</title><link>http://blog.codesector.com/2012/01/30/teracopy-2-3-beta/#comment-444078132</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just tried the 2.3 beta and have experienced two problems -- one minor but one fatal to the use of the program.  The setup for my test was to create four folders on an empty partition, and then to try copying four different partitions into the four folders in the empty partition.  Each such copy (one partition to one empty folder) was done by a drag-and-drop.  This results in four separate teracopy operations and four separate teracopy windows.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I ran this test twice, once dragging the drive icon representing a partition into the empty folder, and once opening the drive, selecting all of its contents (Ctrl+A), and dragging the collection into the empty folder.  The first time I got an enormous number of error messages about invalid paths; that is why I went to the second mode (Ctrl+A of contents).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But the problem is that teracopy stops 2/3 of the way through the first copy, reporting read errors, and then sits in a cpu-bound loop forever.  It does not complete the copy.  On the second try, I get lots of "Read error: Invalid access to memory location" reports in the log, as well as lots of "Read error:" with no further information after the colon. This happens on one of the partition copy attempts.  So I cancelled it and went on.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The minor problem is that after all four copies were created, teracopy spends some time reading the directories, and then all four copies go into "copy waiting" mode -- none actually start copying.  Similarly, after a copy finishes, or a copy is cancelled, none of the other pending copies starts up.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Finally, a request for separate color settings for the two progress bars.  The progress bar for the single file is much to flashing -- files are completing instantaneously and so the progress bar blinking is distracting.  For this reason I set the colors to white (for all states of the progress bar) -- it stops the blinking.  But I wouldn't mind having progress shown on the job-as-a-whole progress bar.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for a handy program (2.2 Beta 3 is the release I use, because all subsequent ones have failed for me during large copies).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If I can help diagnose the problem, I am happy to run some tests.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Randy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 11:09:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TeraCopy 2.3 beta</title><link>http://blog.codesector.com/2012/01/30/teracopy-2-3-beta/#comment-443842706</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Siap &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Roisbwi</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 00:47:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TeraCopy 2.3 beta</title><link>http://blog.codesector.com/2012/01/30/teracopy-2-3-beta/#comment-443347931</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just a small suggestion:&lt;br&gt;I use the 'shutdown when transfer is complete' in those cases, or the Skip All function.&lt;br&gt;However, I can see that an export remaining tasks list can be very useful in some circumstances.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;First time I learned about TeraCopy was in the HiRen BootCD. And now, I can't imagine living without it. I do hope that this will not become blowware.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Simon le Bon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 09:10:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TeraCopy 2.3 beta</title><link>http://blog.codesector.com/2012/01/30/teracopy-2-3-beta/#comment-441855793</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jeff, as you announced a few months ago, are you going to give away license keys for translators?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Panzerjager</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 08:51:23 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
